Big Tech is cozying up to Donald Trump, but Mark Zuckerberg's Meta is going the extra mile

Big Tech seems to be making an unexpected move by cozying up to President-elect Donald Trump. For years, the relationship between Big Tech and politics has always been complex. Recently, companies like Google, Microsoft, Apple, Meta, and Amazon have faced scrutiny for donating $1 million each to Donald Trump’s inaugural committee. Meta, in particular, finds itself at the center of discussions about free speech, content moderation, and political influence.

A Washington Post cartoonist’s resignation added fuel to the conversation. Her cartoon depicted tech leaders bowing to Trump, but the publication rejected it. This move sparked debate about the balance between media responsibility and freedom of expression.

Meta’s stance on “Free Speech”

Meta’s donation is just one part of the story. The company recently announced changes to its content policies, signaling a reduced role for fact-checking in political content. CEO Mark Zuckerberg defended this decision as a step toward greater openness and fairness. He emphasized the importance of fostering an environment where different viewpoints can be shared freely.

 

 

 

 

 

 

View this post on Instagram

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A post shared by Mark Zuckerberg (@zuck)

Naturally, this massive shift has left some worried that loosening fact-checking standards could lead to the spread of misinformation. Others, however, see this shift as a welcome move that supports free speech and reduces perceived censorship. Frances Haugen, the whistleblower who previously exposed Meta’s internal issues, commented on this policy shift, suggesting that it reflects Trump’s influence on the company’s decision-making process.

Leadership changes

Nick Clegg, Meta’s policy chief, recently stepped down. As a key figure in shaping Meta’s policies on political content, his departure marks a significant change for the company. His departure marks a significant change as Meta adjusts its approach to balancing free speech with content responsibility. During his tenure, Clegg often defended Meta’s controversial decisions and policies. Many wonder if his exit signals a shift toward more or less regulatory involvement in political discourse.

Additionally, UFC President Dana White made headlines for his interactions with Meta. Dana, a longtime Trump ally, has reportedly played a role in strengthening ties between Meta and Trump’s camp. Meta has gone as far as to add Dana White to its board of directors. This move, coupled with the policy changes, indicates a clear pivot towards embracing a less regulated, more open platform for political discourse, a policy that Trump has vocally supported.

Historical context

Meta’s relationship with Trump has seen ups and downs. The former president was banned from Facebook following the Capitol riot, but the ban was lifted in 2023. More recently, after Trump was shot and injured at a rally, Zuckerberg publicly expressed support saying that he thought Trump standing up and shouting “fight, fight, fight,” after the shooting was “badass.”

A meeting at Mar-a-Lago last year further highlighted the evolving dynamic between Trump and Meta’s leadership. If you’re having a déjà vu moment, it’s because Elon Musk, CEO of X, has also been vocal about his support for free speech and has restored previously banned accounts, including Trump’s. Musk’s decision sparked widespread debate about platform moderation and the role of tech leaders in shaping political dialogue. This debate is now being amplified even further after Meta announced plans to follow the same path.

The path ahead

As Meta recalibrates its policies, the path forward is fraught with challenges. How the company balances the tightrope between fostering free speech and ensuring a responsible platform environment will be crucial. Whether Meta can navigate this new era without losing its way in the maze of political and ethical considerations remains an open question. What’s certain, however, is that every move Meta makes from here will be scrutinized by users hungry for transparency, the media, regulators eager to maintain democratic integrity, and competitors watching for any slip in the balance of power. Meanwhile, I’ll be watching, popcorn in hand, as this drama unfolds.